Democracy

 

Democracy, we all crave it, some use their democratic right to vote, some just complain, others abuse it.

You elect twelve City Councillors with the expectation that each will have an equal say at the Council table, each will be informed equally, and each will put Napier first. You’d expect all Councillors would be informed about significant issues quickly?  Remember the adage ‘information is power’.

Democracy is great when it works as designed, with well-meaning people elected to roles with their intention of serving the best interests of their community.  The masses love democracy, it provides opportunity for them to delegate responsibilities to others while retaining the ability to complain when it suits them. 

The Achilles heel of democracy is apathy and public disinterest.  

Bearing in mind that Councils are regularly one of the largest employers and contract out a considerable component of work and cashflow into the local economy.  If it was a publicly listed company and you were a shareholder, would you want any numpty on the Board running that company with a $100,000,000 (yep that’s $100 Million) annual turnover and $1,000,000,000 ($1 Billion) worth of assets?  Yet very few voters probably consider that aspect of the election and treat the election as a popularity contest, voting for who they ‘like’ the most as opposed to who will contribute the most around the table. 

That is of course if there are genuine discussions or debate at the table!  

You elect twelve City Councillors with the expectation that each will have an equal say at the Council table, each will be informed equally, and each will represent their constituents’ views but above all else each will put Napier ahead of ward or individual expectation.  

You’d expect that all Councillors would be informed about discussions with third parties or opportunities being presented to Council or significant issues at the same time, or quickly thereafter?  Remember the adage ‘information is power’ some civic leaders still play this game.  If I were Mayor, I’d be more open and transparent with my Councillors operating a high trust model of information sharing to insure informed discussions occur, broader perspectives are explored and decisions are understood. 

In a democracy we don't always have to agree but we have a responsibility to ensure all views are heard! 


I'll say it as I see it, your view may differ and that is ok, so lets be respectful throughout this process.

So lets be nice about it. 

Regards and best wishes 

Nigel Simpson , Candidate for Mayor Napier City Council Elections 2022 

#IfYouCare #NapierIfYouCare #TheThingsYouDontKnowYouDontKnow #Transparancy

This blog is approved by Nigel Simpson, Napier New Zealand - website -  simpson-for-napier.co  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Group think

  Group think is empowered by other people’s apathy and strengthened by its own momentum.  The more the ‘in crowd’ convince themselves that they are right, the less they want to hear from others like employed managers or consultants who are experts in their field and thus power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.  When I say others in this context, I include members of committees or working parties that are not in the ‘in crowd’ or as easily influenced or corruptible as others. You never really learn much from hearing yourself talk. George Clooney How many of you have been involved with a sports club that had historically functioned well, had great social membership, wins at competition, is achieving its goals and objectives, has a well-articulated strategy for new facilities and is going from strength to strength?   But then a small ‘cohesive’ click forms in the committee and others say they can’t be bothered, and they opt off the committee and sooner or later the
Read more

Napier City Council resignations a sign of trouble - Media Release

Image
  July 27, 2022 - Media release        Napier City Council resignations a sign of trouble A run of resignations by senior managers from Napier City Council confirms the council has a serious culture and leadership issue, says councillor Nigel Simpson. In the last six months, three out of six Executive Leadership Team members have resigned and a third moved sideways, later resigning. That leaves just two experienced executive managers from a team of six. Councillor Simpson is standing for the Napier mayoralty in the upcoming Council elections, citing a lack of leadership and effective decision-making. “It is appalling that the mayor is continually agreeing to tens of millions of dollars of unbudgeted items and activities – 14 added to the to-do list just 12 months out from the adoption of the Long Term Plan - while flip-flopping on projects that were supposed to proceed. It makes the job of the chief executive and senior managers almost impossible. “If new projects have to
Read more

Staff leaving why?

There is a lot on the internet about why staff leave due to their managers  so the riddle is  "Why do good capable senior managers who effectively report to the 'Board' leave"?   -  They are on good packages, so that can't be the issue!  -  While limited they have capable corporate capacity to achieve good outcomes, so that can't be it!  -   I don't believe it's the CEO, so that can't be the issue! But suddenly four out of seven of the senior leadership team depart - where's the problem?      Could the answer be in the type of Governance, style of Leadership, flip flop Strategy? “There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don’t know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don’t know we don’t know.” -  Donald Rumsfeld I'll say it as I see it, your view may differ and that is ok, so lets be respectful throughout this process. So le
Read more